This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Agile Buzz
by Steven E. Newton.
Original Post: Build Vs. Buy, Part 2.
Feed Title: Crater Moon Buzz
Feed URL: http://www.cmdev.com/buzz/blosxom.cgi?flav=rss
Feed Description: Views and experiences from the software world.
Continuation of a series examining certain arguments for buying
commercial software an minimally customizing it versus custom-developed
software.
Upgrade Treadmill
In the memo, the author says that a system used by the business is
based on a commercial application and claims 90% of it is standard and 10%
is customized. There's no detail to justify that number, but suppose
the software does 90% of what the customer needs. Left unmentioned in
the memo is how much of the application is useful to the customer. In
other words, what additional features and complexity is the business
paying for with the application suite but not using? It's unlikely
that 100% of the features of a commercial application are used by any
one customer -- but can the business say it is using even 50% of them?
Is that cost effective?
While the vendor's support may help keep the business current
with technology, how much are the vendor updates just a way to keep
the upgrade treadmill running? How often does the vendor introduce an
update where none of the new or changed functionality is useful to the
business? What is the cost of being on the vendor's development schedule,
and how disruptive are upgrades? Worst of all, what happens when the
vendor eliminates a feature that is key to the business?
Feature Creep
In the memo, the author asserts that there is a significant cost
savings to purchasing vendor-supported applications, because the costs of
development are spread across all the customers. That's a bold assertion,
but looking closer, to what extent is that cost savings eroded by the
additional cost of features which are developed but not used in the
business? Is the total cost of the software, including those elements
useful to the business and those that are not, really less than a solution
tailored to the business?