This post originated from an RSS feed registered with .NET Buzz
by Paul Vick.
Original Post: "Reports of my death..."
Feed Title: Panopticon Central
Feed URL: /error.aspx?aspxerrorpath=/rss.aspx
Feed Description: a blog on Visual Basic, .NET and other stuff
Ok, so another article claiming that "VB
is dead" (or, at least, will be one of these days). Nothing particularly new.
What was interesting about the article, though, was a pair of quotes from Uttam
Narsu from Forrester Research. In the middle of the article he says:
[developers] ask if VB is the best language to do OO development.
And generally the answer is no.
Then the same guy who gave the above quote later says:
[...] developers can produce programs faster with VB than with C#.
So... C# is a better language to do OO in, even though it takes longer to write an
OO program in C# than it does in VB. That seems contradictory to me. (There also
a statement by another analyst in the article about all the "baggage" that VB carries,
which I also wonder about, given where the "C" in "C#" comes from...)