This post originated from an RSS feed registered with .NET Buzz
by Scott Hanselman.
Original Post: Avalon - CLI307: Automated UI Testing
Feed Title: Scott Hanselman's ComputerZen.com
Feed URL: http://radio-weblogs.com/0106747/rss.xml
Feed Description: Scott Hanselman's ComputerZen.com is a .NET/WebServices/XML Weblog. I offer details of obscurities (internals of ASP.NET, WebServices, XML, etc) and best practices from real world scenarios.
If you've ever written a complex Windows UI you may have thought about ways to automate
testing of these frameworks. It was easier in the old days, when every control
had a Window Handle that you could get ahold of. Then more and more controls
were owner draw, painted or just magic. Regardless, automated UI testing is
a hassle.
In the last few years I've been all over NUnit. Just as my dentist says “if
you don't floss, don't bother brushing,“ I say, “if you don't Unit Test,
don't bother coding.“ But the exception is usually UI.
I'm in a talk on Avalon's Automated UI Testing Framework.
The Avalon UI Testing Framework appears to expose the UI components as an Object Model,
that they are calling “Control Patterns” that expose the behavior of the
controls.
He's brought a Command Prompt up. He brought up the Windows Device Manager and
clicked on it.
The Command Prompt then displays:
[Tree View] [Has Children]
Patterns = I:Selection
then he types “children” and the Device Manager tree expands.
This means that rather than exposing the controls directly to the UI Testing code,
it exposes the BEHAVIOR. So, in OOP terms, a ComboBox and a Tree Control both
implement “ExpandCollapse.” But it's not that simplistic.
It's really about behavior.
Think about this: If you were using a 3rd party control, you'd have to use that
library's proprietary APIs to manipulate it. With the Windows UI Automation
framework the publisher of that control will expose behaviors. If it's a funky
Outlook Bar, perhaps it exposes ExpandCollapse also.
You can query these controls for their behavior, ala “Reflection.”
Makes me think of how cool it was 8 or so years ago when I saw Spy++. Except
rather than presenting a physical “tree” this framework presents a logical,
practical tree. (The guy in front of me works for Infragistics.
I can only guess what awesome UI Controls they are going to build. They kick
much tush.)
The namespaces (alpha) are MSAvalong.Windows.Automation. This framework supports
ALL LEGACY controls, including VB, WinForms, Win32, etc. There is also a complete
Security Model so your testing software can't be used by the powers of darkness like
.VBS files.
Along with this Logical Tree, you get all Properties, Events, Control Patterns and
all Input (Mouse, Pen, Keyboard, etc). Plus, it supports filtering, so you don't
get messages shouting at you.
Rather than using the Class Name (and there are thousands) to identify a control and
switch on how to test it, you think about the essense of the control and it's
behavior. For example, if you're testing software doesn't know what a control
is, it asks it and hears “Oh, you're clickable? And expandable?” and you
write tests appropriately.
(Awesome, he was just going to start a demo, but the screen saver locked his machine.
He can't remember the password...right now we're looking at a Longhorn security screen
as he tries to log in...ouch...I know what this feels like. He's going to reboot.
Oy.)