The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Java Buzz Forum
Tapestry Server Faces

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
dion

Posts: 5028
Nickname: dion
Registered: Feb, 2003

Dion Almaer is the Editor-in-Chief for TheServerSide.com, and is an enterprise Java evangelist
Tapestry Server Faces Posted: Aug 25, 2004 7:20 AM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Java Buzz by dion.
Original Post: Tapestry Server Faces
Feed Title: techno.blog(Dion)
Feed URL: http://feeds.feedburner.com/dion
Feed Description: blogging about life the universe and everything tech
Latest Java Buzz Posts
Latest Java Buzz Posts by dion
Latest Posts From techno.blog(Dion)

Advertisement
I went to see Erik Hatcher talk about Tapestry at the local JUG last night. It was a good talk, as Erik does a good job and explaining what is good and bad at a developers level (no foofy high level marketing-speak :) If you have used Tapestry, it is painful to look at JavaServer Faces applications. I had a really interesting conversation with Erik about how a framework is needed ON TOP of JSF, to give you a nice way to work. How will we get this framework? Tapestry Server Faces: In theory, since JSF has a lot of extension points, a Tapestry layer could be placed on top of the JSF event handling model. It would look like Tapestry. Feel like Tapestry, but would be running in JSF (I don't know what Tapestry would gain from doing all of this work though) A Faces Impl: Something like MyFaces can come a long and write a layer on top of the JSF crud. They are already doing a good job on making some things easier... and this would be taking it to the next level Struts: Some would argue that Struts as it exists is @deprecated (as Erik puts it). It could evolve to become glue on top of the base JSF framework JSF itself: They could make the spec and the RI decent. Shocking I know. Some New Thing: Of course, some bright spark can come along and out-do everyone :) I wonder if this approach could work. Could we have a usable layer on top of JSF? Would JSF tools be able to work with this world too? Or will we always be stuck in a lowest common denominator? As every vendor comes out, they have their own set of widgets, so you end up working on "Oracle JSF" versus "JSF" anyway. I know, in theory you could use Oracle components on some other server.... but in reality: it is about the tools, and sometimes that doesn't work that great. In this vein, it was good to see the JSF Component Metadata Proposal from Oracle. I really hope that there will be a JSF world where my HTML isn't hidden away under ugly taglibs. This is the web. We work with HTML. Let my designers see it!

Read: Tapestry Server Faces

Topic: London Java Events Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Tapestry, and Less Configuration

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use