|
How does the group communicate?
|
Posted: Sep 26, 2006 3:19 PM
|
|
Lacking tools like a wiki, a decent bug tracking system, and a reasonable revision control system makes it difficult to tell where an organization is, where it's going, and what you (as a new member of the group) can do to help get it there. These are things that bring us together.
Convincing people that a wiki is not only a communication tool, but an essential tool in the process of transforming thoughts into products in a collaborative environment is a long process. Obviously, collaboration can exist without it, but the time I spend digging through standalone design documents and having people explain the same thing to me they've explained to countless other people is just not very efficient for anyone.
A bug tracking system that involves training and bribery to get anything out of it is just likely to not get used well.
Most places I've been to in the last few years at least understand the importance of a good revision control system. That's 1:3 for this place. I can at least see changes, but I really don't have any idea what anyone's working on and as I stumble around in the dark, I can occasionally feel toes under my own.
Probably a more important question than that, though, is whether things are changeable. That's the difference between a bad state of things being an excuse for itself and an opportunity for growth.
|
|