|
This should be irrelevant, OSS DB devs!
|
Posted: Nov 1, 2007 2:56 AM
|
|
Unfortunately MS SQLServer is often chosen, for the following reasons:
1. It is free for <4GB, not that expensive for commercial use and has excellent database management tools e.g. it is piss easy to copy part or all of a database to other databases, on other machines, using enterprise manager (listening OSS tools ppl)! 2. Many people don't know or care that MS SQLServer can be a bloody pain for locking conflicts, Arghhh! Developers accept this, then don't allow for it, WTF! Are they morons? 3. Oracle is way too expensive despite being good and appears to have some really stupid enterprise/stand-alone management flaws. 4. MySQL looks too expensive for too little (for commercial licences), it is not a proper enterprise database and has amateurish database management tools. 5. Many people don't know that the impressive PostgreSQL exists, however it still has less capable management tools than MS SQLServer (getting better though).
I would really like the OSS database community to get a bloody-big world-of-hurt fire lit under them until they provide <i>decent, free, true enterprise level</i> database management tools for OSS databases, so that MS SQLServer can be dumped.
OSS DB guys, learn from the Linux mistakes, be a lot better than Microsoft, not chase them, both for the product core (PostgreSQL) and the tools (OSS not good enough yet), no weird or *nix terminal style GUIs, please!
|
|