The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Agile Buzz Forum
The Election came, The Election went

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
James Robertson

Posts: 29924
Nickname: jarober61
Registered: Jun, 2003

David Buck, Smalltalker at large
The Election came, The Election went Posted: Nov 3, 2004 9:13 PM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Agile Buzz by James Robertson.
Original Post: The Election came, The Election went
Feed Title: Cincom Smalltalk Blog - Smalltalk with Rants
Feed URL: http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/rssBlog/rssBlogView.xml
Feed Description: James Robertson comments on Cincom Smalltalk, the Smalltalk development community, and IT trends and issues in general.
Latest Agile Buzz Posts
Latest Agile Buzz Posts by James Robertson
Latest Posts From Cincom Smalltalk Blog - Smalltalk with Rants

Advertisement

The election has come and gone without major controversy, and without any real question as to who won. The various news outlets are being cautious about calling the race - that stands to reason after they all got burned in 2000. I'm not terribly surprised by the outcome (and I don't mean the winner specifically)

The 2000 election was a rarity - the last time anything like it occurred was 1876 (and before that, the 1820's). Disputed, close elections that are decided by the House (as happened a few times in the early 19th century) or by special procedure (an extra-judicial panel in 1876, the Supreme Court in 2000) are just rare. What they generally mean is:

* The race was between candidates that the electorate has a hard time separating - there's a real or perceived non-difference. That's what happened in 1876 and 2000 * There's more than two candidates who make a major showing - this is what happened when Jefferson was selected by the House, for instance - and when Quincy Adams beat Jackson

Neither situation was the case this year. Most people saw real differences between the 2 major candidates and voted accordingly. The third party candidates - Nader, the Libertarians, et. al. - none of them captured the kind of interest that Perot did in 1992, or that Teddy Roosevelt did in 1912. It all came down to a relatively clear choice between competing philosophies - and one of them won.

If you look at this as a marketing/sales exercise, one side - the Republicans - made the sale. They gained seats in the House, they gained seats in the Senate, and they won the Presidency (both in electoral vote and popular vote terms). The other side - the Democrats - failed to make the sale. The electorate broke towards the Republican argument at the closing bell, and that made all the difference.

It's time for the losers to be gracious, and get back to the blackboard - so that they know how to do better in the next election cycle (not unlike a sales team meeting at the end of the fiscal year reviewing a bad year, actually). The winning side can't really gloat - again, like a winning sales organization, there's no guarantee that the buyers will renew the contracts next time around unless they deliver on their promises. In politics and IT sales, no win is permanent - there's always a chance of "buyers remorse" - which is why sales and marketing teams, no less than political analysts, need to keep their eye on the ball.

Read: The Election came, The Election went

Topic: Grade Z Movie fans Rejoice! Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: The joy of good service

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use