The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Agile Buzz Forum
OOPSLA Day 3

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Greg Vaughn

Posts: 55
Nickname: gvaughn
Registered: May, 2003

Greg Vaughn is a naturally introspective and extemporaneous developer primarily using Java.
OOPSLA Day 3 Posted: Oct 26, 2004 5:57 PM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Agile Buzz by Greg Vaughn.
Original Post: OOPSLA Day 3
Feed Title: Potential Differences
Feed URL: http://gigavolt.net/blog/development/index.rss
Feed Description: Greg Vaughn on Agile methodologies, Java, OS X, whatever piques my interest!
Latest Agile Buzz Posts
Latest Agile Buzz Posts by Greg Vaughn
Latest Posts From Potential Differences

Advertisement

No, you didn’t miss the day 1 and 2 entries. I didn’t write any. Rather than trying to go through each particular session I attend, I’d rather give a general overview at nearly the halfway point. It’s subject to revision by the end of the conference though.

It’s been my observation that OOPSLA is a great place to come to get a feel for where software development is going on a 5+ year horizon. I recall back at the 2000 OOPSLA in Minneapolis getting a hallway demo of AspectJ from Gregor Kiczales after a BoF. This year, AOP is much more prevalent and has progressed well beyond the typical logging example. I attended a tutorial by Ron Bodkin and Nick Lesiecki that focused on real enterprise applicability of Aspects. They had examples of using it to transition a system from EJB Entity Beans to Hibernate. I was intrigued by an example of adding JMX management to a system via Aspects. I do believe AOP is in the mainstream’s future.

Another topic I’m seeing in various places, tutorials, practitioner reports, etc., is an analysis of what Architecture really is. One tongue in cheek definition given by Douglas Schmidt at a tutorial about the Forgotten Craft of Software Architecture is that architects are those people whose development skills are too oudated to still be developers, but don’t look good enough in suits to be managers. I’m following the thought that architects act as a bit of an O/R mapping layer. Their main job is to handle the impedence mismatch between customers and developers. They work at the highest layer of abstraction, and delegate much of the intra-component design to experienced developers.

That brings up another point — I’ve heard the best definition of the difference between a component and an object here. A component can have more than one interface, while an object has only one. I like that.

More later. Alan Kay’s Turing lecture is this evening. There’s also a BoF about Michael Feather’s Working Effectively with Legacy Code book that I plan to attend. Then there’s also a “party” celebrating the 10th anniversary of the GoF Design Patterns book.

Read: OOPSLA Day 3

Topic: BottomFeeder 3.7 is out Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Traditional Waterfall Methodologies destroy options

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use