The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Agile Buzz Forum
Generics shouldn't need explanation

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
James Robertson

Posts: 29924
Nickname: jarober61
Registered: Jun, 2003

David Buck, Smalltalker at large
Generics shouldn't need explanation Posted: Aug 11, 2004 11:19 PM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Agile Buzz by James Robertson.
Original Post: Generics shouldn't need explanation
Feed Title: Cincom Smalltalk Blog - Smalltalk with Rants
Feed URL: http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/rssBlog/rssBlogView.xml
Feed Description: James Robertson comments on Cincom Smalltalk, the Smalltalk development community, and IT trends and issues in general.
Latest Agile Buzz Posts
Latest Agile Buzz Posts by James Robertson
Latest Posts From Cincom Smalltalk Blog - Smalltalk with Rants

Advertisement
Heck, if you have the right tools, you don't need generics. I recall the first time I realized what #doesNotUnderstand: really allowed for in Smalltalk - I was able to build simple proxies without needing a set of extra language features. Unlike, say, C# and Java. Have a look at Julia Lerman's post - it's simpler to do this in the .NET world than it used to be, but still not as simple as it can be. The heart of the message forwarding scheme in the VW CORBA implementation is really, really simple....

Read: Generics shouldn't need explanation

Topic: Re: 'Enterprise' Spoilers Revealed Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Where Graham gets it wrong

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use