The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Agile Buzz Forum
Did SCO Actually Buy What It Thought It Bought?

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
James Robertson

Posts: 29924
Nickname: jarober61
Registered: Jun, 2003

David Buck, Smalltalker at large
Did SCO Actually Buy What It Thought It Bought? Posted: Jan 8, 2004 8:14 AM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Agile Buzz by James Robertson.
Original Post: Did SCO Actually Buy What It Thought It Bought?
Feed Title: Cincom Smalltalk Blog - Smalltalk with Rants
Feed URL: http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/rssBlog/rssBlogView.xml
Feed Description: James Robertson comments on Cincom Smalltalk, the Smalltalk development community, and IT trends and issues in general.
Latest Agile Buzz Posts
Latest Agile Buzz Posts by James Robertson
Latest Posts From Cincom Smalltalk Blog - Smalltalk with Rants

Advertisement
Linux today reports that SCO fooled itself. According to Novell:

On June 26, LaSala wrote: "SCO's statements are simply wrong. We acknowledge, as noted in our June 6 public statement, that Amendment No. 2 to the Asset Purchase Agreement appears to support a claim that Santa Cruz Operation had the right to acquire some copyrights from Novell. Upon closer scrutiny, however, Amendment No. 2 raises as many questions about copyright transfers as it answers. Indeed, what is most certainly not the case is that "any question of whether UNIX copyrights were transferred to SCO as part of the Asset Purchase Agreement was clarified in Amendment No. 2 (as SCO stated in its June 6 press release). And there is no indication whatsoever that SCO owns all the patents associated with UNIX or UnixWare."

The rest of the article is well worth perusing. It's starting to look like SCO's management team convinced itself that it had the goods - without actually verifying that fact. The SCO responses to these assertions look an awful lot like hand waving and "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain" theatrics. This whole thing may well end with nothing more than an epic destruction of shareholder value - SCO's.

Read: Did SCO Actually Buy What It Thought It Bought?

Topic: Why some rules need to be broken Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Law of Demeter and Smalltalk

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use