The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Agile Buzz Forum
The twists and turns of copyright law

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
James Robertson

Posts: 29924
Nickname: jarober61
Registered: Jun, 2003

David Buck, Smalltalker at large
The twists and turns of copyright law Posted: Apr 20, 2006 7:59 AM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Agile Buzz by James Robertson.
Original Post: The twists and turns of copyright law
Feed Title: Cincom Smalltalk Blog - Smalltalk with Rants
Feed URL: http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/rssBlog/rssBlogView.xml
Feed Description: James Robertson comments on Cincom Smalltalk, the Smalltalk development community, and IT trends and issues in general.
Latest Agile Buzz Posts
Latest Agile Buzz Posts by James Robertson
Latest Posts From Cincom Smalltalk Blog - Smalltalk with Rants

Advertisement

Ars Technica gives a good summary of what's going on between the RIAA and the EFF in the current copyright fights in the courts - and it's stranger than I thought. Take this, for instance:

As far as the courts are concerned, the issue of distribution and digital transmission is significantly murkier. The EFF's brief illuminates just how murky the issue is, with some courts taking for granted that digital transmission does constitute infringing distribution and at least one lower court hewing to the letter of the law and ruling that it does not. The EFF therefore urges the US District Court to be the first court to explicitly tackle the issue of digital transmission and distribution, and to define "distribution" so that it requires the exchange of a physical object.

The part that's fascinating and somewhat ironic, at least to me, is that the EFF is now in the position of arguing in favor of an outmoded, pre-Internet concept of "distribution," and one that runs directly counter the plain sense of the way that both the language and the concept of "digital content distribution" is currently employed in just about any online venue where the topic is discussed. Would anyone argue that Apple is not, in fact, in the business of distributing music now? (Actually, that's a bad example, because Apple may be arguing exactly that in their ongoing dispute with Apple Records. Still, you get the point.)

I hadn't given that much thought - but the existing law depends on a physical transfer of a copyrighted work. As I vaguely recall, copy machines introduced a monkey wrench that took awhile to sort out - a lot of "fair use" precedent derives from the case law that resulted from that invention. So here we have the internet, which - as Ars Technica notes - throws a huge wrench into the entire (legal) of distribution. If I upload a copyrighted work, have a transferred it? What if that upload isn't to a public system, but simply to another device I own? What if the upload is to another media format? That's what's at stake here, and it's all up in the air at the moment.

Read: The twists and turns of copyright law

Topic: Software WithStyle T-Shirts Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: The syndication sweet spot

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use