I found the following article
interesting, and is in harmony with
what I’ve been saying recently …
http://www.cutter.com/research/sample.html
In particular, the following paragraph
was interesting. After talking about
how offshoring has driven the easy
“define all the requirements up
front” work to offshore, he continues
with:
That left a core of more complex
projects: the ones that had strategic
import, that affected the backbone of
the organization, that required
far too much user involvement to be
successfully offshored. These too
were the projects that were important
enough so that cost savings were not
at the top of their sponsors’ lists.
And these are the very projects in
which XP and other agile methods
work best.