This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Agile Buzz by James Robertson. Original Post: Re: Lisp 2003 = Lisp 1982 Feed Title: Cincom Smalltalk Blog - Smalltalk with Rants Feed URL: http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/rssBlog/rssBlogView.xml Feed Description: James Robertson comments on Cincom Smalltalk, the Smalltalk development community, and IT trends and issues in general. Latest Agile Buzz Posts Latest Agile Buzz Posts by James Robertson Latest Posts From Cincom Smalltalk Blog - Smalltalk with Rants

Now, I've been posting away about the virtues of Lisp and Lisp like languages in an effort to educate folks about what Lisp can do. But I certainly don't think that there's no room for advancement. So it was a little disturbing to read this

Could he be right? Is old-style Common Lisp or Scheme actually the best that we can do?

in Greenspun's post. Not because Greenspun believes it, but because I think a lot of people in the Lisp community appear to believe it. It's not enough to say Python/Ruby/C#/Java 2003 = Lisp 1982

Many people have the same perceptions about Smalltalk - they read about it once a long time ago, maybe used it a bit, and have since decided that it's old and outmoded (never mind that Java and C# are pale imitations). I don't think the pothole we fell into in 1997 is as deep as the one Lisp is in, but we do need to get the word out further.