The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

.NET Buzz Forum
WS-Security, et al, vs. Plain Old Web Services with SSL

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
douglas reilly

Posts: 108
Nickname: dougreilly
Registered: Oct, 2003

douglas reilly is the owner of Access Microsystems Inc., a small software development consulting fir
WS-Security, et al, vs. Plain Old Web Services with SSL Posted: Sep 25, 2004 3:40 PM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with .NET Buzz by douglas reilly.
Original Post: WS-Security, et al, vs. Plain Old Web Services with SSL
Feed Title: Doug Reilly's Weblog
Feed URL: http://www.asp.net/err404.htm?aspxerrorpath=/dreilly/rss.aspx
Feed Description: ASP.NET and More...
Latest .NET Buzz Posts
Latest .NET Buzz Posts by douglas reilly
Latest Posts From Doug Reilly's Weblog

Advertisement

I have been looking into doing some WSE development (WS Security specifically interested me).  In looking carefully at the issues involved (including the issue Scott mentions here), I am wondering whether a move to WS-Security and the rest will buy me anything over and above using Web Services over https?  The amount of data transferred using the Web Service in question is relatively small, and the SSL overhead has never been an issue.  I currently own the code on both ends of the Web Service request.

Has anyone done any serious study of this? 

Read: WS-Security, et al, vs. Plain Old Web Services with SSL

Topic: Code Camp II updates Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: NerdDinner.com: for all your nerd dinner needs

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use