.NET Buzz Forum - .NET to COM and back.

Articles |
News |
Weblogs |
Books |
Forums

Artima Forums | Articles | Weblogs | Java Answers | News

Sponsored Link •

.NET Buzz Forum
.NET to COM and back.

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
Sign In

Back to Topic List

Reply to this Topic

Search Forum

Threaded View


Previous Topic		Next Topic

Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page

Scott Hanselman

Posts: 1031
Nickname: glucopilot
Registered: Aug, 2003

Scott Hanselman is the Chief Architect at Corillian Corporation and the Microsoft RD for Oregon.

.NET to COM and back.

Posted: Aug 12, 2004 11:23 PM

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with .NET Buzz by Scott Hanselman.
Original Post: .NET to COM and back. Feed Title: Scott Hanselman's ComputerZen.com Feed URL: http://radio-weblogs.com/0106747/rss.xml Feed Description: Scott Hanselman's ComputerZen.com is a .NET/WebServices/XML Weblog. I offer details of obscurities (internals of ASP.NET, WebServices, XML, etc) and best practices from real world scenarios.	Latest .NET Buzz Posts Latest .NET Buzz Posts by Scott Hanselman Latest Posts From Scott Hanselman's ComputerZen.com

(This is being written on a TabletPC with newly installed SP2 in a Quiznos in downtown Olympia using God knows whose WiFi connection.)

I'm sure we all know that you can't COM-interop to a COM object that's really a .NET COM Callable Wrapper, the question is why not? (Personally I think the answer is "Why would you want too, and how would you have expected it to behave?) However, the PTB aren't buying that answer. Yes, I know it's stupid, but why is it not supported?

image001123456.jpg

Read: .NET to COM and back.

Previous Topic

Next Topic


	Web Artima.com