The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

.NET Buzz Forum
C# Language Features beyond Whidbey

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Eric Gunnerson

Posts: 1006
Nickname: ericgu
Registered: Aug, 2003

Eric Gunnerson is a program manager on the Visual C# team
C# Language Features beyond Whidbey Posted: Feb 5, 2004 3:31 PM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with .NET Buzz by Eric Gunnerson.
Original Post: C# Language Features beyond Whidbey
Feed Title: Eric Gunnerson's C# Compendium
Feed URL: /msdnerror.htm?aspxerrorpath=/ericgu/Rss.aspx
Feed Description: Eric comments on C#, programming and dotnet in general, and the aerodynamic characteristics of the red-nosed flying squirrel of the Lesser Antilles
Latest .NET Buzz Posts
Latest .NET Buzz Posts by Eric Gunnerson
Latest Posts From Eric Gunnerson's C# Compendium

Advertisement

Diego Mijelshon  asks

Now that C# 2.0 is almost here, I'd like to know about features that were left out from this release and planned for the future.

We are primarily focused on getting Whidbey polished and out the door right now, so there isn't a lot of thought about features beyond Whidbey right now. Even when we do get into that mode, I probably won't be talking about it.

One of the reasons that we don't like to talk about things when their in the investigative phase is that they are very preliminary. If I said, for example, that we were thinking about adding parallelizing capabilities to C#, then that would be likely to set up an expectation. It might turn out that we weren't able to do that, perhaps because there wasn't a good way to design it, we didn't have time to build it, one of the teams that we were collaborating with changed their focus or schedule, or a multitude of other possible reasons.

Traditionally, we've been fairly binary on this - we don't talk about things until they're already implemented and tested, even if it's fairly sure that we're doing them. We are trying to figure out how to be a little more open in that area.

Eric

Read: C# Language Features beyond Whidbey

Topic: Scoilnet up again Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: .NET Nightly 102

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use