The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

.NET Buzz Forum
Is SmallTalk a real option?

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Roy Osherove

Posts: 1807
Nickname: royo
Registered: Sep, 2003

Roy Osherove is a .Net consultant based in Israel
Is SmallTalk a real option? Posted: Jan 20, 2004 12:55 AM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with .NET Buzz by Roy Osherove.
Original Post: Is SmallTalk a real option?
Feed Title: ISerializable
Feed URL: http://www.asp.net/err404.htm?aspxerrorpath=/rosherove/Rss.aspx
Feed Description: Roy Osherove's persistent thoughts
Latest .NET Buzz Posts
Latest .NET Buzz Posts by Roy Osherove
Latest Posts From ISerializable

Advertisement

There's a nice little back and forth developing over at Cincom Smalltalk blog (Yes, it is a smalltalk'ish blog):

Over on QLOD, a new Smalltalker asks:

"What makes me wonder though: Are Smalltalkers really that much more productive. In contrast to C or C with a bad IDE and without libraries maybe, but in contrast to a more modern language ? (Think about something like AS1 with additional runtime typechecking and a big library like java, probably a bad example :)) Can anyone provide some pointers ? "

A large part of the productivity comes from consistency. In Smalltalk, everything is an object. No primitive data types, no special rules on certain types of methods - which means you spend more time focused on the actual problem, instead of on how to fight the system to allow you to solve the problem. Another big thing is extensibility. We can extend any class in Smalltalk - need a new method in String? Go ahead and add it. No need to start wrapping all your string references with a new class, and wondering how to get third party libraries to play ball. Blocks add some capabilities that neither Java nor any CLR language have as well. Anyone else have answers?

(You'd do well to read some of the comments on that post and also this post for more reasons)

I've tried Smalltalk before and had problems with it. The main problem was that I didn't "get" it. As a developer, I'm always looking for ways to be productive. f someone says to me that SmallTalk is more productive that my current .Net infatuation, I'll believe it. Provided proof of course. There are many good reasons over there why SmallTalk is more productive, but what happens when you move it into the enterprise application space?

How well does it cope with creating web services? using distributed solutions? talking to other applications? integration? Maintenance? How widespread is it? If I learn SmallTalk, will I be able to get a job in it? will I be able to leverage my current skills in .Net using SmallTalk, or just write some of my business logic in it while the other parts using a .Net language? (Isn't there a SmallTalk.Net out there?)

Read: Is SmallTalk a real option?

Topic: .Text My Subscribers Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Google conspiracy

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use