The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Ruby Buzz Forum
Proc goodness, enum badness

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Daniel Berger

Posts: 1383
Nickname: djberg96
Registered: Sep, 2004

Daniel Berger is a Ruby Programmer who also dabbles in C and Perl
Proc goodness, enum badness Posted: Feb 9, 2005 7:30 PM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Ruby Buzz by Daniel Berger.
Original Post: Proc goodness, enum badness
Feed Title: Testing 1,2,3...
Feed URL: http://djberg96.livejournal.com/data/rss
Feed Description: A blog on Ruby and other stuff.
Latest Ruby Buzz Posts
Latest Ruby Buzz Posts by Daniel Berger
Latest Posts From Testing 1,2,3...

Advertisement
I should have a new release of proc/wait3 out soon. This originally started off as a port of the wait3 and wait4 methods, but I've been adding some of the other advanced process related methods. The next release will include:

* Process.wait3
* Process.wait4
* Process.waitid
* Process.pause
* Process.sigsend

I did hit one snag when wrapping sigsend, however. It seems Ruby's makemaker wrapper, mkmf, has no way of detecting an enum constant ahead of time. The values defined in signal.h for the idtype_t enum can vary from platform to platform, e.g. P_PROJID. This makes wrapping those constants in Ruby in a cross platform manner somewhat problematic. Basically, you'll have to check your idtype_t enum and hand-edit the source. Ick.

I plan on submitting a patch to ruby-core for a have_enum_member method very soon to deal with this. This is actually the first time it's ever come up for me when writing C extensions. It's unusual to see values like like that wrapped in an enum rather than defined with macro preprocessor constants, but the header file has a comment that indicates that its values conflict with some other library. I can only guess it has something to do with that.

Read: Proc goodness, enum badness

Topic: Railstorm Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Daemonize

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use