The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Ruby Buzz Forum
Building of Basecamp

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Jamis Buck

Posts: 184
Nickname: minam
Registered: Oct, 2004

Jamis Buck is a C/Java software developer for BYU, and hacks in Ruby for fun.
Building of Basecamp Posted: Jan 29, 2005 10:05 AM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Ruby Buzz by Jamis Buck.
Original Post: Building of Basecamp
Feed Title: the buckblogs here
Feed URL: http://weblog.jamisbuck.org/blog.cgi/programming/index.rss
Feed Description: Jamis Buck's corner of the blogging universe. Mostly about ruby, but includes ramblings on a variety of topics.
Latest Ruby Buzz Posts
Latest Ruby Buzz Posts by Jamis Buck
Latest Posts From the buckblogs here

Advertisement

So, I’m just returned from the most recent Building of Basecamp workshop in Seattle, put on by those web-wizards at 37signals.

A one word summary: “wow!”

Jason Fried, Ryan Singer, and David Heinemeier Hansson gave the presentation, each standing to offer something to the current topic. That approach worked very well. They fielded questions throughout the eight-hour workshop, and were very professional.

Virtually everything they talked about rang true for me, even their most controversial statement that denied the conventional wisdom of the usefulness of functional specifications. Jason was quite firm on this point, even in the face of some push-back from a few attendees. He believes (as do I) that one of the big problems with functional specs is that it gives a false sense of solidarity between the parties involved. The spec, which is typically a written document, can (and will) be interpreted in any number of ways by those participating, which means that when the document is approved, it is approved with different ideas of what it means by everyone involved. Thus, when the product is finished, there is disagreement about whether or not it actually meets the criteria given in the spec.

Instead of a functional spec, the 37signals crew recommends paper sketches and HTML mockups. These, being visual elements, are much easier for participants to relate to, and are more susceptible to immediate feedback regarding their accuracy.

I also really liked Ryan’s segment of the presentation, in which he talked about some of the design issues involved in the creation of Basecamp. He demonstrated the Yellow Fade Technique that 37signals introduced with Basecamp. He also emphasized the importance of semantic markup. This came up when asked what HTML editor they used—they replied, “vim”, and said that they prefer to write the markup themselves.

And then, of course, David talked about the implementation of Basecamp, taking it from the HTML screens mocked up by Jason and Ryan, and plugging the code into it. This was fascinating because he talked about the evolution of Rails. He didn’t sit down intending to write Rails—he was out to write Basecamp. But as he worked on Basecamp, he saw portions of the code that were reused frequently, and he refactored those pieces out into a separate framework. This framework eventually became Rails. He emphasized, as he did at RubyConf, that a “framework should be extracted,” not just built ex nihilo.

After the workshop we all went downstairs to “The Alibi Room” and chatted. I sat at a table with Dave Thomas, David Heinemeier Hansson, and Ryan Davis, among others. Very fascinating conversation.

Then the 37signals crew treated me to dinner at “The Pink Door”, an italian restaurant in a dark alley with no sign… The restaurant was recommended by a native that we asked, but it still felt like we were entering a speakeasy. ;) It turned out to be a very nice restaurant, and the food was magnificent.

I was originally going to hook up with David and Dave Thomas the next morning, but my flight had to leave a few hours earlier than I had thought, so I had to skip out on them. And not having any way to contact them (I didn’t know what hotels they were staying in) I could only hope that they wouldn’t wait around too long for me. I’m not usually a flake, I promise!

Anyway, it was a great workshop. If you ever have a chance to attend a Building of Basecamp workshop, do not pass it up. Fantastic stuff.

Read: Building of Basecamp

Topic: 34 Very valid reasons Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: ‘Ruby on Rails is unbelievably good’

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use