The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Ruby Buzz Forum
Ruby.org Mockup

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Red Handed

Posts: 1158
Nickname: redhanded
Registered: Dec, 2004

Red Handed is a Ruby-focused group blog.
Ruby.org Mockup Posted: Jan 19, 2005 12:49 PM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Ruby Buzz by Red Handed.
Original Post: Ruby.org Mockup
Feed Title: RedHanded
Feed URL: http://redhanded.hobix.com/index.xml
Feed Description: sneaking Ruby through the system
Latest Ruby Buzz Posts
Latest Ruby Buzz Posts by Red Handed
Latest Posts From RedHanded

Advertisement

On Ruby-Talk, there’s been some discussion about working on a simple, friendly Ruby portal for new users. I think Ruby-Lang is pretty good actually (and has come a long way since NaHi redesigned).

Still, after Ben Giddings mentioned the plausibility of negotiating ownership of Ruby.org or Ruby.net, I couldn’t let the idea go. Something like this:

Envisioned screenshot of Ruby.org

Three things I like in this shot:

  1. Current sites are given preference. The links in the main body must all be active, current sites. No old docs. No old news. The featured news would require maybe 2 or 3 updates a month. This would be very simple.
  2. Rails is on the front page. Rails is a hot topic. The front page needs to reflect the most interesting aspects of Ruby to visitors.
  3. Ruby in 5 minutes. It would be great if we could pool together a simple summary of Ruby. A five-page, one-minute-per-page summary, similar to YAML in Five Minutes. If someone reads a short article on Ruby, they may start wanting to read more. (“I’ve read for five minutes, but I have some time, so why don’t I just spend the evening learning about this language?”)

I think Ruby has plenty of libraries. We could use more, but we have great libraries that a lot of communities don’t have. I think we could use better docs. Something closer to PHP or Python. This will happen, though. We have the content in RDoc, it just has to be organized.

We just need a web presence that is kept current. Most Ruby sites age several months without update.

I’d also love to emphasize using Ruby with C. Ruby’s C API is brilliant. It’s so fantasically elegant when compared to other scripting interfaces. I think an extensions section would be really attractive as well.

Read: Ruby.org Mockup

Topic: del.icio.us/eban Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: It has been about ten days since we first started writing the

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use