The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Ruby Buzz Forum
Ruby Ternary operator re-written with Boolean operators

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Jamie Hill

Posts: 161
Nickname: jamie007
Registered: Nov, 2006

Jamie Hill is Managing Director of SonicIQ Limited in the UK specialising in XHTML, CSS and Rails.
Ruby Ternary operator re-written with Boolean operators Posted: Aug 23, 2007 6:05 AM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Ruby Buzz by Jamie Hill.
Original Post: Ruby Ternary operator re-written with Boolean operators
Feed Title: The Lucid
Feed URL: http://feeds.feedburner.com/thelucid
Feed Description: Lightweight ramblings and tips on Ruby and Rails.
Latest Ruby Buzz Posts
Latest Ruby Buzz Posts by Jamie Hill
Latest Posts From The Lucid

Advertisement

Just noticed something interesting (well not that interesting). Ternary operators in Ruby can be re-written using Boolean operators e.g.

method = object.respond_to?(:foo) ? :foo : :bar

would become…

method = object.respond_to?(:foo) && :foo || :bar

Simply replace ? with && and : with ||

I don’t know if there is any performance gain here, anyone care to investigate?

Read: Ruby Ternary operator re-written with Boolean operators

Topic: Gmail Account Warning!!! Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: RailsRumble: 48 de horas de desarrollo para una aplicación web

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use