This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Ruby Buzz
by Robby Russell.
Original Post: Designers, Developers, and the x_ Factor
Feed Title: Robby on Rails
Feed URL: http://feeds.feedburner.com/RobbyOnRails
Feed Description: Ruby on Rails development, consulting, and hosting from the trenches...
Our team is lucky enough to be in a position where we have both designers AND developers working on the same code base in parallel.
Since Ruby on Rails adopts the Model-View-Control pattern for separating business logic from the presentation layer, we’re able to give our designers a lot of breathing room for how need to design the interface, whether it’s for interaction or aesthetic reasons. However, sometimes this breathing room has resulted in small bugs slipping into the application interface. In general, nothing disastrous, but each bug that slips into the queue, slows down the project and we want to avoid as much of that as possible.
I’d like to share a few issues that we’ve seen occur on various occasions, and then show you what we’ve done to avoid them happening again.
Scenario #1: The case of the changed div id, (victim: designer)
Designer adds a few HTML elements to the page, defines an id on a <div> tag and styles it with CSS.
A few days later, a developer needs to make some changes, tests it in their favorite browser and commits.
Later, the designer doesn’t understand why the styling is all messed up. “It was working fine.”
...minutes, hours… go by where the designer tries to track down the issue. “Oh! Someone renamed the id in this <div> tag. Sigh.”
Developer apologies, but explains that he needed to do it because he needed to make it work with his new RJS code.
Scenario #2: The case of the changed div id, (victim: developer)
Developer is implementing this cool new Ajax feature into the web application
The code relies on there being one or many HTML elements in the DOM with specific id values defined.
Example: <div id="comments_list">
A few days later, a designer is making some changes to the layout and needs to restyle some of the view that this <div> tag is defined. Designer decides to change the id to a different value for any variety of reasons. (or perhaps they changed it to use a class instead of styling it by the id). Often times, we don’t know who set the id or class… and many times the developers aren’t savvy enough with HTML and designers end up cleaning things up a bit.
Later, code is checked in and designer didn’t notice that the Ajax was now breaking as they weren’t focusing on the user interaction aspects of the page, just the aesthetics.
Day or two later, developer sees bug, “Feature X isn’t working, throwing JavaScript error…”
Developer is confused, “Hey, that was working! What happened?”
Developer tracks down the problem, discusses with designer, they figure out a solution. Problem solved.
I could outline a few other examples, but I really wanted to highlight these two types of situations, as our team has seen this happen on several occasions. Luckily, we’ve learned through these experiences and have taken some measures to try and avoid them in the future.
Moving forward (together)
Both of the examples above, were essentially the same problem, but resulted in problems for a different role in the design and development cycle. While, I’ve definitely been the victim of #2 several times myself, I know that I’ve also been the guilty of #1. So, what can we do as designers and developers to work with each other without causing these little problems from occurring? (remember: many little problems can add up to a lot of wasted time spent resolving them)
Several months ago, I had a meeting with Chris (User Interface Designer) and Graeme (Lead Architect/Developer) to discuss this very problem. At the time, we were implementing a lot of Ajax into an application and were occasionally running into Scenario #2. We discussed a few possible ways of communicating that, “yes, this div id should NOT be changed (without talking to a developer first)!”
Idea 1: Comment our “special” HTML elements
We discussed using ERb comments in our views to do something like the following.
<% # no seriously, please don't change this id, it's needed for some Ajax stuff %>
<div id="comments_list">
...
We all agreed that, while effective, it was going to clutter up our RHTML code more than any of us desired.
Team Response:Meh.
Idea 2: Reserve id’s for developers
Another idea that came up, was to ask that designers only use classes and ids wold be used by the developers when they needed it.
Chris pointed out that this wasn’t an ideal solution as there is a distinct case for when to use ids versus classes.. and he is very strict about adhering to the HTML/CSS standards.
Team Response: Not hot about it…
Idea 3: Naming convention for Ajax-dependent elements
The third idea that was discussed, was specifying a naming convention for any elements that were needed by our Ajax code. We played around on the whiteboard with some ideas and settled on the idea that we’d prefix our id’s with something easy to remember for both designers and developers.
We agreed on… x_ (x underscore), which would make an element id look something like this:
<div id="x_comments_list">
...
While this adds the strain of two more characters to much of our RJS code, we don’t run into Scenario #2 very often anymore.
render :update do |page|
page[:x_comments_list].visual_effect :highlight
end
I find that this helps our team keep a clear distinction between what can and shouldn’t be changed in the views by our designers. Sometimes they have a good reason to do so, but they know that if there is x_, then they should ask one of the developers on the team for assistance in renaming it without causing any problems in the application. It also allows our designers to add classes to these elements, or style the id that we’ve defined.
Team Response: Wow, was that all we needed to agree on? Hooray!
This leads me to some other problems that have/may come up, but I’ll discuss that in my next post on this topic, when I’ll show you how we can use RSpec to avoid these sorts of designer versus developer problems.
If you’re working in a similar environment, how are your designers and developers working, together, in perfect harmony?
Until next time, remember to hug your designer. ...and if you’re still having developer design your applications, consider hiring a designer. ;-)
Previous Topic
