The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Ruby Buzz Forum
Violence, kids, video games

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Daniel Berger

Posts: 1383
Nickname: djberg96
Registered: Sep, 2004

Daniel Berger is a Ruby Programmer who also dabbles in C and Perl
Violence, kids, video games Posted: Jul 31, 2006 8:45 PM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Ruby Buzz by Daniel Berger.
Original Post: Violence, kids, video games
Feed Title: Testing 1,2,3...
Feed URL: http://djberg96.livejournal.com/data/rss
Feed Description: A blog on Ruby and other stuff.
Latest Ruby Buzz Posts
Latest Ruby Buzz Posts by Daniel Berger
Latest Posts From Testing 1,2,3...

Advertisement
I always find it interesting when the topic of video games, violence and its potential negative impact comes up. I think it's because I'm rather fascinated by psychology in general.

The reaction from most of the geek crowd is usually one of denial, i.e. that violent video games have no real impact on kids. Usually they cite the fact that there's no direct evidence to support that hypothesis, or that the evidence is contradictory. The closest studies to disprove the effects that I've seen were all conducted on young adults (17+) for relatively short periods of time (a couple months or less), but I don't think these studies prove much since you are probably much less susceptible to any negative effects by the time you're 17.

The thing is, it will never be proven, not with the under 12 crowd. Not because it's impossible scientifically - I think it is - but because it's impossible *ethically*. Imagine if a psychologist conducted a long term study on a bunch of 10 year kids to determine the effects of violent video games. Now imagine that the psychologist found conclusive evidence that not only did violent video games have negative short term effects, but also that it would probably have permanent, negative long term effects on their behavior.

Can you say 'gross ethics violation'? Can you say, 'lawsuit'? Can you say, 'career suicide'? Can you say, 'possible jail time'? Can you say, 'A bunch of fucked up 10 year olds who might have years of issues to deal with because of your study'? Yes, I thought you could.

And so, we are left with our intuition and fights over video game laws, which most (single, childless) geeks hate and most parents support. My own belief is that there probably are harmful, negative effects in general, but that it's random in individuals, and the effects drop drastically with age.

Read: Violence, kids, video games

Topic: support for plist.rb Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Howto Make simply_restful Useful For Real People

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use