The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Ruby Buzz Forum
Where is our "magic-removal branch"?

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Ryan Davis

Posts: 651
Nickname: zenspider
Registered: Oct, 2004

Ryan Davis is a ruby nerd.
Where is our "magic-removal branch"? Posted: Apr 23, 2006 5:42 PM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Ruby Buzz by Ryan Davis.
Original Post: Where is our "magic-removal branch"?
Feed Title: Polishing Ruby
Feed URL: http://blog.zenspider.com/index.rdf
Feed Description: Musings on Ruby and the Ruby Community...
Latest Ruby Buzz Posts
Latest Ruby Buzz Posts by Ryan Davis
Latest Posts From Polishing Ruby

Advertisement

Django recently announced that their "magic-removal branch" is ready for beta testing. Basically, a couple of months ago they branched to make "several sweeping changes to the framework to improve its usability and remove unnecessary 'magic.'" In other words, they are refactoring their code, cleaning it up, and using proper engineering techniques now where they previously used Clever Tricks. This will make their code much more maintainable over time and is a Good Thing&tm;.

All healthy software goes through periods of expansion followed by contraction. Rails seems to avoid this latter phase (I suspect) for two reasons:

  • refactoring is not as sexy as adding new features
  • the tests for rails are really not good enough to actually trust (so other developers like me really can't submit refactorings).

But damn, it is in dire need of cleanup. Massive amounts of cleanup. So my real question is, when does rails get some love?

rails_growth.png

Rails Code and Test Size per Release (rough numbers)

Read: Where is our "magic-removal branch"?

Topic: That's not simplicity. *This* is simplicity. Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Writing Domain Specific Languages

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use