The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Ruby Buzz Forum
Gosling FUD is Laughable

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Obie Fernandez

Posts: 608
Nickname: obie
Registered: Aug, 2005

Obie Fernandez is a Technologist for ThoughtWorks
Gosling FUD is Laughable Posted: Dec 16, 2005 1:32 PM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Ruby Buzz by Obie Fernandez.
Original Post: Gosling FUD is Laughable
Feed Title: Obie On Rails (Has It Been 9 Years Already?)
Feed URL: http://jroller.com/obie/feed/entries/rss
Feed Description: Obie Fernandez talks about life as a technologist, mostly as ramblings about software development and consulting. Nowadays it's pretty much all about Ruby and Ruby on Rails.
Latest Ruby Buzz Posts
Latest Ruby Buzz Posts by Obie Fernandez
Latest Posts From Obie On Rails (Has It Been 9 Years Already?)

Advertisement

You think good ole James has been hearing about Ruby on Rails lately? This has to be one of the weakest criticisms of dynamic languages that I've ever read:

Another was about testing, reliability and maintainability. One of the common properties of scripting languages is brevity. This tends to lead to omitting declarations, weak typing and ignoring errors. Generally a great thing if you're quickly putting something together; not so great if you want checks and balances that crosscheck correctness.

That is laughable, especially coming from the father of a language that spawned a generation of exception swallowers. Thorough unit and functional testing is the best way to crosscheck correctness -- believing that static typing has anything to do with it is the best way to instill a false sense of security!

Another is generality. Many scripting languages get a good part of their coolness from being specialized - by having key functionality wired into their hearts. A good example is pearl, with it's great regular expressions and hash tables. But this drags in a number of issues, chief among them being: what if you want to do something outside the language's area of specialization? Many modern apps need to do exactly that, so one of two things happen: languages get used for wildly inappropriate things (fourier transforms in PostScript), or a collection of languages get used together (which can make it very hard for any one person to understand them, and interconnections can be a nightmare).

By the way James, it's Perl, not pearl, and you should put a book on logical reasoning and argumentation on your xmas list this year. Good grief.

Read: Gosling FUD is Laughable

Topic: pratique de la gamme diatonique Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Problems with Delicious

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use