The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Python Buzz Forum
Dangerous: treating memcached as a persistent store

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Phillip Pearson

Posts: 1083
Nickname: myelin
Registered: Aug, 2003

Phillip Pearson is a Python hacker from New Zealand
Dangerous: treating memcached as a persistent store Posted: Feb 14, 2005 2:18 AM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Python Buzz by Phillip Pearson.
Original Post: Dangerous: treating memcached as a persistent store
Feed Title: Second p0st
Feed URL: http://www.myelin.co.nz/post/rss.xml
Feed Description: Tech notes and web hackery from the guy that brought you bzero, Python Community Server, the Blogging Ecosystem and the Internet Topic Exchange
Latest Python Buzz Posts
Latest Python Buzz Posts by Phillip Pearson
Latest Posts From Second p0st

Advertisement

Hmm, people are using memcached to persist user/session information. This sounds awfully dangerous. memcached will happily delete stuff from the cache in order to make space for something new you give it. As soon as you start getting near the maximum space available in the cache, strange things will happen.

It might be safer to use something like a MySQL MEMORY table - not quite as quick, but still stored in RAM, and it won't auto-delete rows from your table.

Update: Titus writes in to say it wasn't a serious suggestion. Phew!

Comment

Read: Dangerous: treating memcached as a persistent store

Topic: How MySQL fails to optimise LIMIT Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Weird Eclipse error

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use