This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Python Buzz
by Ian Bicking.
Original Post: Choosing Sides
Feed Title: Ian Bicking
Feed URL: http://www.ianbicking.org/feeds/atom.xml
Feed Description: Thoughts on Python and Programming.
There comes a time in every man's life when he has to choose
sides. I have chosen my side. I am comfortable with my decision. I
do not think everyone on my side is a saint, but I know that those
on the other side are much, much worse.
Sometimes a man with too broad a perspective reveals himself as
having no real perspective at all. A man who tries too hard to see
every side may be a man who is trying to avoid choosing any
side. A man who tries too hard to seek a deeper truth may be
trying to hide from the truth he already knows.
That is not a sign of intellectual sophistication and "great
thinking". It is a demonstration of moral degeneracy and
cowardice.
I agree, and find the intellectualization of politics that removes
moral concerns to be bankrupt. The avoidance of conclusion and
judgement is a way to avoid responsibility -- you can never be wrong
if you never believe anything. But it's ironic that he and I disagree
completely in our conclusions (he backs the Iraq war).
We cannot reformulate our beliefs everytime new facts are revealed, in
fact we cannot even determine the facts. First, we must choose who we
believe -- what version of the facts, what interpretation of the
situation. This is why we must choose sides.
When I choose my side, I base my judgement on the many evils those in
the administration have supported, these men who sold weapons to Iran
to fund another terrorist group in Nicaragua; who supported Iraq even
as it was using chemical weapons; who supported the mujahideen, who
besides their recent infamy were made up of drug dealers and men who
would throw acid in the faces of women who didn't wear veils; or
the anti-democracy apocalypse-seekers like Pat Robertson... these
are dealers in oppression and death. There are good effects of the
Iraq War -- for all I know it will be ultimately positive -- but I
must oppose it out of principle. Not an anti-war principle, not a
leftist principle, certainly not a pro-Saddam principle, but I oppose
it because I oppose those men.
We have to choose our sides. We can't just decide what story is more
appealing, we can't settle for mere plausibility (terrorism, WMDs,
democracy) when the real motivations stare us in the face. (Now
Kerry has said he was lied to when he voted for the war, which should
not have surprised him because the administration is made up of liars.
He now acts surprised -- how could he have known!?! -- but in fact
the whole worldknew, and he knew too but decided to pretend
otherwise as it was more politically expedient. Bastard.)
If you don't believe in choosing a side you might as well forget about
the whole thing, be apolitical and ignore the news. If you don't
choose a side, all the attention you give to events is no more
meaningful than keeping track of the plotlines on soap operas.