The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Java Buzz Forum
Cargo cult specification

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Bill de hÓra

Posts: 1137
Nickname: dehora
Registered: May, 2003

Bill de hÓra is a technical architect with Propylon
Cargo cult specification Posted: Apr 2, 2004 2:05 AM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Java Buzz by Bill de hÓra.
Original Post: Cargo cult specification
Feed Title: Bill de hÓra
Feed URL: http://www.dehora.net/journal/atom.xml
Feed Description: FD85 1117 1888 1681 7689 B5DF E696 885C 20D8 21F8
Latest Java Buzz Posts
Latest Java Buzz Posts by Bill de hÓra
Latest Posts From Bill de hÓra

Advertisement
Tim Bray finds a cluster of of webservices specs and asks: Is this the future? Is the emperor dressed? - Tim Bray Tim has found twenty six specs. Elsewhere the apache wiki more comprehensively lists forty eight, but I'm sure there's closer to sixty and that's not including any of the Grid computing ones which baseline with WSDL/SOAP. There are so many, in fact, that I've justified setting up an RSS feed cut from the apache wiki, so the rest of us (pun intended) can keep up. Bob Sutor said recently that this has to be the year we stop talking about SOAP and WSDL. True, but really SOAP and WSDL are the least of our worries. The industry collectively needs to stop generating specifications for specifications sake. A lot of webservices spec writing and work within standards bodies is being done without much (it seems) real understanding of what the value of specifications and standards bodies are. Richard Feynman has described this mentality perfectly: In the South Seas there is a cargo cult of people. During the war they saw airplanes with lots of good materials, and they want the same thing to happen now. So they've arranged to make things like runways, to put fires along the sides of the runways, to make a wooden hut for a man to sit in, with two wooden pieces on his head for headphones and bars of bamboo sticking out like antennas—he's the controller—and they wait for the airplanes to land. They're doing everything right. The form is perfect. It looks exactly the way it looked before. But it doesn't work. No airplanes land. So I call these things cargo cult science, because they follow all the apparent precepts and forms of scientific investigation, but they're missing something essential, because the planes don't land. 1 I see WS-* as a cargo cult and as such it runs the risk of being a failure. Thankfully some folks get it, and realise we need to ratify and ground things at the very least in running code, even if we don't quite have rough consensus. [1] I first came across the Feynman quote many moons ago when Steve McConnell described the cargo cult in software engineering....

Read: Cargo cult specification

Topic: Everyone Loves Puppy Pictures Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Less Spam

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use