The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Java Buzz Forum
Dale's Anti-Language Lawyer Rule

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Weiqi Gao

Posts: 1808
Nickname: weiqigao
Registered: Jun, 2003

Weiqi Gao is a Java programmer.
Dale's Anti-Language Lawyer Rule Posted: Feb 27, 2007 1:47 PM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Java Buzz by Weiqi Gao.
Original Post: Dale's Anti-Language Lawyer Rule
Feed Title: Weiqi Gao's Weblog
Feed URL: http://www.weiqigao.com/blog/rss.xml
Feed Description: Sharing My Experience...
Latest Java Buzz Posts
Latest Java Buzz Posts by Weiqi Gao
Latest Posts From Weiqi Gao's Weblog

Advertisement

I missed today's OCI internal C++ lunch meeting. However I caught the email thread that ensued about a piece of C++ code, the meaning of which was not agreed upon in the meeting. Kevin, the good C++ language lawyer he is, checked the standard and send out the email. Dale followed up on the email:

Kevin wrote:
>
> So, in short, I was wrong again.

As was I, but I still think the code is bad. :-(

Dale's anti-language-lawyer rule:  If you have to
consult the standard to see if the code is correct,
then the code is incorrect.

>
> KevinH

I just thought the world would be a better place if more people followed Dale's rule.

Read: Dale's Anti-Language Lawyer Rule

Topic: Juggling many different roles, and the pros and cons of a one-person project. Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Follow-up to “Some issues in the HttpServlet source code”

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use