Back in December I posted an excited entry about IBM’s Lotus Connections (then named “Project Ventura”) after sitting through an intro during the Software Group’s Analyst Summit. I’d come to the room late, so hadn’t heard that the session was embargo’ed until Lotusphere, and went ahead and posted it. IBM AR sent me a kindly worded note asking me to take it down, which I immediately did, being terribly embarrassed at having missed that critical point about embargo.
Needless to say I now have an over-developed sense for what should be under embargo. As people who brief me will tell you, I ask all the time even when it’s obvious.
First Impressions from Dec., 2006
That confession out of the way, here’s what I originally posted back then, with some slight edits to update names:
While seeing CMDB’s auto-filled is thrilling, the most exciting thing I’ve seen at the event is IBM’s “Ventura” project. I saw part of it in the labs session I went to yesterday, but one of the other sessions yesterday — labeled something like Web 2.0 and/or Social Computing — was the full-bore overview of IBM’s upcoming offering around blogs, social bookmarking/tagging, social networking, and the layers of combination above all of those.
[Lotus Connections]
While you can’t get it from IBM just yet, [Lotus Connections] is the productized suite of several “Web 2.0″ technologies, like:
Profiles [IBM’s BluePages] - an end-user oriented directory for storing and looking through people profiles
Lots of glue - things like search (which I need to get more details on), integration with SameTime and otherwise making all the components feel more like a suite rather than just separate things. And, of course, enterprisey things like directory integration and security. And, of course, feeds on everything.
One thing missing, as Carol Jones pointed out, is a wiki. The word is they’re still deciding on one to use, with the clarification that IBM’s QEDWiki is more about wiki as an application platform (a la jotSpot) than wiki as a document/text collaboration tool.
Another missing item, which I asked about, was a feed reader (or “aggregator”). With all the feeds around, it’s a bit odd that [Lotus Connections] doesn’t have a feed reader to use out of the box: whether it’s from IBM or an endorsed reader from someone else. I’ve always liked the NewsGator stories along these lines of pre-populating and updating people’s feeds per their role. Having a feed reader would help tie all of Venture together even more so. That said, I get the feeling that Lotus looks more towards SameTime as the focal point for everything…which may not be too bad: it’s not your father’s IM “client.”
Writing this up, I realize that I’ve given [Lotus Connections] on a pass on being open rather than closed. If I was writing up SharePoint, for example, I’d have looked much more critically at the open question. So, we’ll have to see on that point for [Lotus Connections]. That said, Carol showed us that for most (all?) of the pages that you can click on a link at the bottom that shows you the REST call/API to get for the page. Here comment was something along the lines of “whatever we can do, you can do.”
Lunch is calling, so I’m cutting myself off here. The summary is that [Lotus Connections] is something to be excited about: once delivered, we’ll have to check back with it to see if it’s an implementation of the “bring Web 2.0 behind-the-firewall” vision I’ve been waiting on for sometime.
Here are the notes:
Updated Thoughts
Host It
The biggest opportunity for Lotus Connections is an easy to sign-up-for and scale hosted offering for Lotus Connections. While much of the motivation behind Connections is seemingly the opposite of that — having it all behind your firewall for security, compliance, and other integrations with corporate IT — the SMB market is typically more than willing to have their data in the cloud if that data is locked behind authentication.
Key to this SaaS point is a tangential thought from a channel comment Stu Mac makes about Lotus Connections:
IBM needs to market to new channels of communications to its end users. The demand for Connections is far more likely to come from end users than from IT. Therefore, I think that buzz needs to be created with Podcasters, Video blogs and so on. In facts this morning I have emailed Leo to suggest that this gets mentioned on TWiT this week.
Requiring “users” to procure, provision, and install servers will be a non-starter for that type of adoption. While encouraging users instead of IT to buy technology might be too user-centric for corporate IT, it certainly was a profitable model for things like, say, spread sheets and PCs ;>
User Rick: How can you uninstall my software? On what grounds?
IT Manager Renault: I’m shocked, shocked to find that users are installing their own software behind-the-firewall!
Software Update Agent: Your Yahoo! client has a new update, sir.
IT Manager Renault: Oh, thank you very much.
Stowe Boyd has some good, cautionary thoughts about Lotus Connections vis-a-ve group/role driven architectures vs. individual-driven architectures. To me, the larger point is: much of the success of Lotus Connections and other “Enterprise 2.0″ suits depend on cultural changes and/or adaptations in the enterprise.
The flip side is that critics will attack the general ideas on that weak point from multiple dimensions:
You nerds love this stuff, but the normal worker could give a damn. They’ll still use email and IM. Cut-n-paste and Word will rule. You can’t force people to go 2.0.
As a dichotomic pivot on the first point: people will realize that they can just use the public web to do all this. Culture will change, but out of the control of IBM & Co. So, while the idea is good, the offerings from IBM and any other “elder company” will fall flat.
Having all of this stuff locked up behind-the-firewall or a secure cloud will take away the benefits we see on the web. Part of this concern is one of scale: will this “work” for 100 people instead of the 1,000’s who use public web services? Steve addresses this point well in his second Q&A on the Connections.
Now, I’m not suggesting that Lotus Connections has those problems. Rather, since a large part of the success of Connections and other Enterprise 2.0 offerings depends on culture rather than technology, those sorts of traps are ready to spring. Unlike straight up technology, cultural change in IT is a tricker affair.
Back at the IBM SWG analyst summit, we urged IBM to take the culture issue by the lapels and ramp up with training and outbound communication about the actual adoption and day-to-day use of Lotus Connections. More so than IBM’s other software offerings, but very much like the rest of the Lotus portfolio, something like Lotus Connections requires a lot of wet-ware in addition to software.
As a side-note to non-IBM people, if Lotus Connections becomes successful, IBM will have validated the general perception of there being a market for Enterprise 2.0 products behind-the-firewall. That is, other people will have an easier time selling this type of software. As they say, you always need “The Other” when marketing.
Now, I’m not suggesting that the ideas of taking * 2.0 behind-the-firewall were bunk and then suddenly this week IBM un-bunked them. Nor am I discrediting the past and current efforts along those lines. Instead, I’m saying that the success of Lotus Connections will make previously skeptical customers less skeptical and easier to sell such software to. Less education would be needed in the sales-cycle.
On the other hand, if Lotus Connections doesn’t do well, it might be so much the harder for non-IBM folks to sell * 2.0 software to business.
Good luck to all!
Yuh!
Now, it’s my job to fret over things and poke them with a stick. That taken care of above, I want to make sure I fully communicate how cool I think Lotus Connections looks. The disclaimer rests in that last word: I haven’t used it myself or talked with people who have (and, of course, IBM is a client).
That said, as someone who’s been lusting to pull the benefits and applications of the public web behind-the-firewall for years, I feel like Lotus Connections is a fantastic go at that. Again, we’ll have to see how the sugar really tastes once it’s in the coffee: but from what I’ve seen and conversations that I’ve had, Lotus Connections is worth keeping a close eye on.
Previous Topic
