This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Java Buzz
by dion.
Original Post: Top cities to live? or top suburbs?
Feed Title: techno.blog(Dion)
Feed URL: http://feeds.feedburner.com/dion
Feed Description: blogging about life the universe and everything tech
These lists always make me laugh. It seems that every place I have lived in has claimed that it has won the "top place to live in FOOBAR magazine".
However, the lists show me the statistical view of things. It shows that it is better to live in a suburb than an actual city.
For example, I think that it is a lot nicer to live in Boulder, CO than Westminster, CO. However, the "price" amount of the equation will knock Westminster up in the rankings.
How can great cities such as NYC and San Fran not be anywhere to be seen on these lists? They may not be for everyone, but they have a lot going for them and I think I would prefer them to: Olathe, KS, West Bloomfield , MI, Richardson, TX, or Gilbert, AZ for examples (no offense to those cities).