The Artima Developer Community
Sponsored Link

Java Buzz Forum
PeopleOverProcess.com: US Government Requiring More Security to Prevent Data Theft

0 replies on 1 page.

Welcome Guest
  Sign In

Go back to the topic listing  Back to Topic List Click to reply to this topic  Reply to this Topic Click to search messages in this forum  Search Forum Click for a threaded view of the topic  Threaded View   
Previous Topic   Next Topic
Flat View: This topic has 0 replies on 1 page
Michael Cote

Posts: 10306
Nickname: bushwald
Registered: May, 2003

Cote is a programmer in Austin, Texas.
PeopleOverProcess.com: US Government Requiring More Security to Prevent Data Theft Posted: Jul 10, 2006 10:05 AM
Reply to this message Reply

This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Java Buzz by Michael Cote.
Original Post: PeopleOverProcess.com: US Government Requiring More Security to Prevent Data Theft
Feed Title: Cote's Weblog: Coding, Austin, etc.
Feed URL: https://cote.io/feed/
Feed Description: Using Java to get to the ideal state.
Latest Java Buzz Posts
Latest Java Buzz Posts by Michael Cote
Latest Posts From Cote's Weblog: Coding, Austin, etc.

Advertisement

I don't know the in's and out's of OMB decrees on the Federal government, but from this story, it looks like Federal government is doing a good job at addressing security concerned and data leakage. There can always be something better, but even these steps are more than I'd expect, that is, nothing.

While I certainly applaud action like this, I still maintain that the core problem is that an identity thief can screw your life over if he has your name, SSN, and other information that I'd expect to be "public." That is, the problem with The System is not that baddies can get ahold of that information, but that they need only that information to do bad things.

On the other hand, we clearly favor a good enough approach to security for the efficiencies and speed of transactions it provides: sliding a credit card it better than writing out a check. The end result, as I mentioned last time on this topic, is the unspoken agreement that we favor the group's ease over the individual: we profit in aggregate from crappy security, but individuals who get hacked have to go through months, if no years, of hassle.

On another note, thinking back on the hyped up drug-scares of the 80's and the red hunting of the 50's, do we actually know if all those lost laptops are having a huge, negative impact? I assume they are, but you know what they say about assuming.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Read: PeopleOverProcess.com: US Government Requiring More Security to Prevent Data Theft

Topic: Is Java EE's complexity its worst enemy? Previous Topic   Next Topic Topic: Lecando releases Haven 1.2

Sponsored Links



Google
  Web Artima.com   

Copyright © 1996-2019 Artima, Inc. All Rights Reserved. - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use