This post originated from an RSS feed registered with Java Buzz
by Fred Grott.
Original Post: Managability Blog wrong?
Feed Title: ShareMe Technologies LLC-The Mobile Future
Feed URL: http://www.jroller.com/shareme/feed/entries/rss
Feed Description: A Weblog about Java programming and digital convergence on mobile devices in such areas as P2P and collaborative technology.
First Point: In the world of enteprise systems and integrating service wise accross companies, countries, and etc the most neutral language approach to or the glue is web service standards. You can code SOAP and the rest of webs ervice standards in all major enterprise computer lagnauges and scripting languages including perl, java, and etc.
Second Point: In world of large service vendors its highly important to their customers that they have solutions while java centric in nature avoid making intefacing with non-java systems labour intensive. To say that is market speak without valid software enginering cocnerns is pure FUD!
While the JBI doe snto address being language neutral there is one proejct at the moment that probably receive heavy full time code commitments from IBM and BEA, namely Celtrix. This is becuase the current project members of Celtrix understand that their implementation should be as language neutral as possible. In fact, they are currently the only implementation taking such an approach.
Of course JBoss tends to be more nimble in these areas, do you think JBoss will beat IBM and BEA to the punch and make Celtrix a JEMS product?
I should mention that this little end run aroudn the imperfectiosn of the JBI spec is not only being lead by ObjectWeb projects such as Celtrix. But, also by projects such as ASF's Synapse which is to provide a Webserivces Broker to ESB/JBI that is not java centric in nature but web services standards in nature centric. Note that two ESB vendors, IONA and Sonic, are partipating in these project goals.