|
Re: What's next for Heron?
|
Posted: Jan 26, 2006 11:45 PM
|
|
Thanks for the code.
> By the way your question "could you have posted" is a > rhetorical question, rather than an actual request. It is > a small grammatical error, but if I didn't know you better > it would have sounded like a snide comment.
Why not just assume the worst? ;)
Seriously, no, it was meant as an actual request. So maybe "Could you (please) post the code?" would be correct? The use of "could" was for politeness; certainly no offence or snide comment was intended, and thanks for letting me know of the possibility of misunderstanding.
I only asked for the code, because it's difficult to assess your claims of brevity and elegance, without seeing the actual code (I thought you might have written a string class in C++, as well).
As there doesn't exist much, if any, documentation for Heron at this point (at least what I've been able to find, except for example code), I'm trying to understand your code. One thing I'm wondering about is where memory allocation happens (in your code), and also if you could briefly explain the "inner" construct? I know it's been discussed in other threads, but for people not having read those, it may be helpful. Perhaps also briefly explain what the main features of your program does, such as "requires" and "extension". Again, I know it has been discussed elsewhere, but it could be good to have it in one place, together with the program, allowing people to better assess the language and code.
|
|